14 ms·
Music streaming at current prices thus far really hasn't proven to be that sustainable, and the available libraries are always in flux as negotiations fail. I t
by Omniusaspirer 10y ago
Music streaming at current prices thus far really hasn't proven to be that sustainable, and the available libraries are always in flux as negotiations fail. I think it's perfectly worthwhile to invest effort into lasting music delivery systems that are entirely under your control while still retaining the streaming capability that we're all so used to now.
- k-mcgrady 10y ago>> I think it's perfectly worthwhile to invest effort into lasting music delivery systems that are entirely under your control Agreed but I would argue that solution is a physical medium. You will always have the ability to play your content. With iTunes you're firstly at the mercy of iTunes developers. Personally I go with streaming (Apple Music) and I buy my favourite albums on vinyl so that if I stop paying my streaming subscription I still have music.
- Omniusaspirer 10y agoPhysical media is definitely a solid option if you don't mind the space and effort considerations. I opt for a middle ground by using Emby as my current solution. It allows me to physically store all my media on local drives, back it up to some free unlimited Google Drive accounts via edu addresses (fully encrypted), then can do local playback within my network or stream it out to any remote devices. It's largely open source, but there's always that worry I suppose that the devs ruin it at some point and I'll need to move to a new solution. Unfortunately there's a lot of work needed if I was to completely code my own solution, so hopefully I'll never need to.
- logfromblammo 10y agoI buy CDs, rip to FLAC with EAC, store on external hard drive, transcode to MP3 with Foobar2000, and upload to my Android phone--or anything else except Apple products, really--with an ordinary USB cable, with no additional software required. I recently got an M-Disc capable drive, so that I can stop messing around with rotating DVD-R backups. Those things supposedly last 1000 years with no bit-rot, and 25 GB media are about $0.08/GB now. That's still 8x as expensive as tapes, but probably more than 8x as convenient for me. I want to ensure that my descendants will always have the option to play music without paying anyone anything more than I already paid for the privilege, for as long as 12cm digital disc players exist. I have never had a streaming subscription. I typically have the maximum number of songs that will fit on my device playing on random select. If I am not in the mood for a particular song, I have unlimited skips, so I use them. It ensures I at least have the opportunity to listen to everything I have ever bought/received while at my home computer, and a subset of whatever I like everywhere else. Streaming services are still useful for discovery. I use them when adding new CDs to my gift wishlist. Whenever I don't want to be in complete control of everything that I listen to, I can always flip on OTA FM radio or a free music service. That's plenty good enough to be introduced to new music and possibly new (to me) artists. But then I get that CD and continue as usual. Never will I ever give up my option to be in complete control. I think buying music on vinyl records would be ridiculously stupid for me, but fortunately for everyone, I am not in charge of what other people are allowed to like. The encoding format of pressed vinyl analog music tracks has been fixed for decades, after all, and anyone can build decoding devices unencumbered by patents now. I just prefer digital. Everyone can still hate iTunes for their own reasons.