4 ms·
You have a gut feeling it will revert. Okay, great. But the consequences are on the scale of a significant fraction of the world's GDP as well as a significan
by dzdt 10y ago
You have a gut feeling it will revert. Okay, great. But the consequences are on the scale of a significant fraction of the world's GDP as well as a significant fraction of the world population. Should we maybe have someone study it more carefully?
So say we find a bunch of smart people to think about the question. Give them the biggest computers money can buy. Have multiple competing teams who double-check each other and get rewarded if they find mistakes in others' work or have new ideas to improve the study. Make it big -- it is important, right? Global. Lots of smart people, lots of the biggest computers. Anything they need to help their work.
And after years of their work, when they come back with a report [1], then lets just ignore it and trust your gut instead, right?
[1] http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/mindex.shtml http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/mindex.shtml
- senorjazz 10y agobravo (although you did make me spit coffee all over my laptop which I am not happy about....)
- pfarnsworth 10y agoWhat are you talking about? You're acting like I dismissed global warming as not existing. I'm just saying that I believe the one year anomaly that we're experiencing will revert back to the mean. Keep your misdirected politics out of my thread, save it for Yahoo Answers.