Many of us are tired of seeing HN used as a popsci soapbox. As you likely know, this forum consistently upvotes rigor-less trials and unreproducible experiments

Many of us are tired of seeing HN used as a popsci soapbox. As you likely know, this forum consistently upvotes rigor-less trials and unreproducible experiments. It's interesting to perceive "wrong conversation" as more valuable than "correct statements" and is very telling about HN's current role.