3 ms·
Edited. Was Australia a part of Indian subcontinent back then?
by thewhitetulip 10y ago
Edited.
Was Australia a part of Indian subcontinent back then?
- cyberferret 10y agoWe are talking artifacts that are maybe 500 years old, not millions of years, which was when Australia was part of Gondwanaland.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- dguest 10y agoActually continental drift explains a variety of phenomena that have been falsely attributed to human exploration: English is spoken in New York, for example, because the british isles used to be connected to New England. Even the names reflect this: when the landmasses separated Queen Victoria proudly viewed them as a geological projection of the British sphere of influence and christened her new islands "New England" "New York", "New Hampshire" etc.
- fuck_google 10y agoDo you work at Apple?
- cynicaldevil 10y agoDunno if trolling or actually serious...
- crucialfelix 10y agoI assume you are joking, but India was actually smooshed up against Australia back in Pangea 335m years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea#/media/File:Pangaea_continents.svg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea#/media/File:Pangaea_co...