4 ms·
There's no direct benefit to the spammer. More effort would go into pruning spammers (from those who are paying, spam protection services) and if twitter credi
by RileyJames 10y ago
There's no direct benefit to the spammer. More effort would go into pruning spammers (from those who are paying, spam protection services) and if twitter credited their account for any payments related to an account marked as spam it seems like it could work. Definitely an interesting model.
- cuchoi 10y agoYou are right but Twitter benefit from Spammer and the people that sells followers. They have no incentives to go after them. Any person that uses Twitter knows that many of their followers are bots/Spam.
- lazyjones 10y agoThat's very similar to the situation with click-based advertising in search engines. I wouldn't say that it isn't working for everyone involved (except those who pay the ads).