3 ms·
We do use systems that exhibit it under certain constraints, as per my example. Additionally, these constraints are highly common in practice. The result is th
by ABCLAW 10y ago
We do use systems that exhibit it under certain constraints, as per my example. Additionally, these constraints are highly common in practice.
The result is that Arrow's theorem itself isn't a rebuttal, as per my first point, and discussion should center around the other two elements of Arrow's theory. Specifically whether or not they are, in practice, worse than our current situation.
Which they aren't. So why trot out Arrow's theorem for the 90th time?
- thaumasiotes 10y ago> We do use systems that exhibit it under certain constraints, as per my example. This is an error on your part. Your example does not violate non-dictatorship; the rules of the election permit anyone to vote against their party registration. Arrow's theorem is about the design of elections, not predictions about how people will vote in practice.