From this paper: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2853669 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2853669 > On the basis of meta

From this paper: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2853669 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2853669 > On the basis of meta-analytic findings, this paper presents the validity of 31 procedures for predicting job performance and the validity of paired combinations of general mental ability (GMA) and the 29 other selection procedures. Similar analyses are presented for 16 predictors of performance in job training programs. Overall, the two combinations with the highest multivariate validity and utility for predicting job performance were GMA plus an integrity test (mean validity of .78) and GMA plus a structured interview (mean validity of .76).