3 ms·
True, however, the problem is preserving humans from near extinction, not preserving our knowledge and culture for the few who might survive if we ignore the pr
by gnaritas 10y ago
True, however, the problem is preserving humans from near extinction, not preserving our knowledge and culture for the few who might survive if we ignore the problem.
- Razengan 10y ago> for the few who might survive It doesn't have to be for our survivors... We could, and I believe we should, do it for the next civilization to come after ours, even if it's a few alien visitors. If for no other reason than to leave a legacy of our short existence against the infinity of this universe.
- gnaritas 10y agoI and I'm sure most people on this planet don't care about leaving a legacy to a future species when the problem at hand is our own survival.
- Razengan 10y agoNobody's saying we should give up or not try to survive, but IF the options came down to: Going extinct — or — Going extinct without any trace whatsoever of our existence left behind, which would you prefer? You said it yourself: If you can't mobilize man to fight climate change, you aren't going to mobilize him to prepare for it either.
- gnaritas 10y agoI won't care, because I'll be dead. So let me be clearer, the notion that anyone will care about leaving proof of our existence rather than themselves trying to survive I find laughable. It's an easy nonsense thing to say when living in relative comfort but when the reality of survival kicks in, such lofty bullshit will go right out the door and you'll be fighting to eat and live another day, not worrying about humanity leaving traces behind for posterity.