3 ms·

The irony here is no Democrats want to take away any guns. Most Democratic proposals have been along the lines of stricter background checks. Republicans - elec

The irony here is no Democrats want to take away any guns. Most Democratic proposals have been along the lines of stricter background checks. Republicans - elected officials - really are calling for blanket Muslim bans.

ythn 10y ago
> The irony here is no Democrats want to take away any guns. I don't believe this. I know too many democrats who believe that the 2nd amendment is obsolete and that guns should not be owned by civilians (or even normal police officers). > Most Democratic proposals have been along the lines of stricter background checks. Right, because that is the maximum amount of legislation that is even possible to get passed. Outright ban of guns would get shot down (so to speak) from the outset. If and when stricter background check legislation passes, will Democrats rest easy on gun issues? No. They will introduce more and more, progressing inch by inch until our gun laws are similar to UK or Japan.
- Pharylon 10y ago
  I'm glad you can see into the minds of these Democratic legislators and know what they really want to do in their heart of hearts. It must be easy making the "Both Sides Do It"(TM) argument when you can quote one side and then just imagine something equally bad for the other side to have said.
- komali2 10y ago
  >They will introduce more and more Do you have a source for this or are you speculating?
  - ythn 10y ago
    > Do you have a source for this or are you speculating? Yeah I have a source - Maryland. The bluest state, posterboy of the Democratic platform. We have the strictest gun laws in the country, and the Democrats are never happy. 3 years ago we had significant new restrictions introduced to restrict gun ownership, way more restrictive than any other state. It's all but impossible for normal civilians to get CCP and Maryland does not respect CCPs of any other state.
masonic 10y ago
no Democrats want to take away any guns. Oh, yes they have. Heck, Dianne Feinstein went on 60 Minutes advocating door-to-door collection, lamenting the Constitutional barriers to doing so.

ythn 10y ago

> The irony here is no Democrats want to take away any guns. I don't believe this. I know too many democrats who believe that the 2nd amendment is obsolete and that guns should not be owned by civilians (or even normal police officers). > Most Democratic proposals have been along the lines of stricter background checks. Right, because that is the maximum amount of legislation that is even possible to get passed. Outright ban of guns would get shot down (so to speak) from the outset. If and when stricter background check legislation passes, will Democrats rest easy on gun issues? No. They will introduce more and more, progressing inch by inch until our gun laws are similar to UK or Japan.

Pharylon 10y ago
I'm glad you can see into the minds of these Democratic legislators and know what they really want to do in their heart of hearts. It must be easy making the "Both Sides Do It"(TM) argument when you can quote one side and then just imagine something equally bad for the other side to have said.
komali2 10y ago
>They will introduce more and more Do you have a source for this or are you speculating?
- ythn 10y ago
  > Do you have a source for this or are you speculating? Yeah I have a source - Maryland. The bluest state, posterboy of the Democratic platform. We have the strictest gun laws in the country, and the Democrats are never happy. 3 years ago we had significant new restrictions introduced to restrict gun ownership, way more restrictive than any other state. It's all but impossible for normal civilians to get CCP and Maryland does not respect CCPs of any other state.

masonic 10y ago

no Democrats want to take away any guns. Oh, yes they have. Heck, Dianne Feinstein went on 60 Minutes advocating door-to-door collection, lamenting the Constitutional barriers to doing so.