3 ms·

I think you are painting with too broad a brush. But even within that framework, there is room to have things that one 'imagines' about God, that one doesn't n

I think you are painting with too broad a brush. But even within that framework, there is room to have things that one 'imagines' about God, that one doesn't necessarily 'believe' as a part of ones core beliefs about God. Certainly various religious sects have core beliefs about the human-divine relationship- however, within most belief systems, there remains a great deal of speculation and room for 'imagination'. For example, within the LDS(Mormon) sect, a core belief is that this life is a testing grounds- and a place to learn. That would fit very well within the context of this life being a simulation, of sorts.

mannykannot 10y ago
But in what way would it be like the sort of simulation being discussed here?
- ensignavenger 10y ago
  Well, after starting at the posted article and going back several layers, it isn't really clear to me what sort of simulation is being discussed... only a "computer" simulation. But what sort of computer? Plenty of room to speculate. There was another aspect- the argument that we are in a simulation created by descendants of humanity to study their past- a purpose that would be hard to reconcile with most religious beliefs about the purpose of life. I was primarily replying to the idea of this life being a simulation, not so much the purpose of that simulation, though.
  - mannykannot 10y ago
    I am referring to 'simulation' as used in the posted article. As for types of computer, there is fundamentally only one - Turing-equivalent machines (there is some speculation that quantum computing might have additional capabilities, but that is highly speculative, in a 'the mind is mysterious, quantum mechanics is weird, so the mind must be using as-yet unelucidated quantum phenomena' sort of way.) All this and more is discussed in this blog [1]. The word 'simulation' may have several meanings. We should beware of tacitly assuming that a metaphorical or analogical use establishes an actual correspondence. [1] http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3208 http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3208

mannykannot 10y ago

But in what way would it be like the sort of simulation being discussed here?

ensignavenger 10y ago
Well, after starting at the posted article and going back several layers, it isn't really clear to me what sort of simulation is being discussed... only a "computer" simulation. But what sort of computer? Plenty of room to speculate. There was another aspect- the argument that we are in a simulation created by descendants of humanity to study their past- a purpose that would be hard to reconcile with most religious beliefs about the purpose of life. I was primarily replying to the idea of this life being a simulation, not so much the purpose of that simulation, though.
- mannykannot 10y ago
  I am referring to 'simulation' as used in the posted article. As for types of computer, there is fundamentally only one - Turing-equivalent machines (there is some speculation that quantum computing might have additional capabilities, but that is highly speculative, in a 'the mind is mysterious, quantum mechanics is weird, so the mind must be using as-yet unelucidated quantum phenomena' sort of way.) All this and more is discussed in this blog [1]. The word 'simulation' may have several meanings. We should beware of tacitly assuming that a metaphorical or analogical use establishes an actual correspondence. [1] http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3208 http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3208