4 ms·
I don't think that the response is entirely unreasonable; Google doesn't have to comply if they don't want to, and it will just be a game of who flinches first
by csydas 10y ago
I don't think that the response is entirely unreasonable; Google doesn't have to comply if they don't want to, and it will just be a game of who flinches first after that.
It's not really unprecedented to request a change in policy or to try to influence a service you're using. I agree with you that this should just be an accepted cost of algorithm based advertising, but I don't see the response as particularly unreasonable. The companies want a change in how it works, and they're trying to throw their financial weight behind it.
I mean, it's not like they're suing to break contract, they're just not continuing to use the product because it no longer is serving their needs.
I'm really not trying to be a corporate apologist here - whether their ads are there or not I won't see them so I frankly don't care. But I'm not sure why there is a condescending attitude towards the corporations for trying to make a change, and then stopping use of a product they deem to no longer meet their needs.
- ignoramceisblis 10y agoTotally understood, and agreed: companies are allowed to use (or not) whatever services they want, and they will ask for whatever they want. My original comment was made to point out: they got what they (should have) expected, and now they're dealing with damage control. Which I would fully expect them to do.