2 ms·
Yes, hence my comment about the argument being made null by the existence of a standard--but that's only in theory. In practice, often because of OS-driven cons
by sidlls 10y ago
Yes, hence my comment about the argument being made null by the existence of a standard--but that's only in theory. In practice, often because of OS-driven constraints (e.g. the desktop vs Android version of any given browser), different tradeoffs with respect to the quality, breadth, and depth of implementation differ.
The point is this: the existence of a standard doesn't guarantee uniformity in implementations.
- notyourwork 10y agoBased on that premise, why do we even have a standard? Oh yea, because of the intention for interoperability.
- BuuQu9hu 10y agoA standard _allows_ for uniformity, the only barriers are technical. CDM providers are actively _preventing_ uniformity. There is a massive difference.