4 ms·
If that were the only parameter in the argument, that would be true. However, there are two things, in this case, that make the OP's point valid: First, N=1. Th
by teilo 16y ago
If that were the only parameter in the argument, that would be true. However, there are two things, in this case, that make the OP's point valid: First, N=1. This is, for all practical purposes, a Gen 1 device. There really will be a significant improvement in Gen 2, annoyances removed, etc. I learned this the hard way with the G1, a phone I could not honestly recommend anyone buy. But I would council anyone to buy a Nexus One now, even though there will be something better later.
Second - By the time Gen 2 comes around, the apps will exist to make this device ever so much more usable and useful than it is today. Again, this is an N=1 problem that does not apply to N+1 where N>1.
- ghshephard 16y agoSo, to some degree, we're actually at N=3 or 4, with the iPhone 3,3G, 3GS and various incarnations of the iPod Touch being where Apple finessed many of their elements like copy/paste. Also, the mature application development environment, and the 150,000+ Applications would not be what you'd typically find on a Generation 1 device. What's ironic is that for the longest time, the major hit against Apple was that it didn't put much effort into providing backward compatibility with it's platform, unlike, say, Microsoft that would let you run your DOS Application in an operating system built 30 years later. Now, the tables have turned, and almost all of your original iPhone applications run just fine on your iPad. It actually drives me crazy how friends of mine ignore the newer iPad apps so they can play the old school iPhone games that I transferred from my iPhone.