5 ms·
Just here to plug an up-and-coming editor called Howl: https://howl.io https://howl.io I did some of these tests with Howl, here are the better numbers: - Mem
by shalabhc 10y ago
Just here to plug an up-and-coming editor called Howl: https://howl.io https://howl.io
I did some of these tests with Howl, here are the better numbers:
- Memory (hello.c): 22748 (RSS)
- Rehighlight test: about 3s
- Time used to load test.xml, jump to end of file and exit: 2.1s
- microcolonel 10y agoIs there a terminal frontend for howl? It looks like LuaJIT emacs (or I guess more like ymacs) which is potentially interesting.
- shalabhc 10y agoThere is no terminal frontend. Yes 'LuaJIT emacs' with a nice API is probably a good description. It does have a vi editing mode as well.
- pawadu 10y agoThanks for posting this! I find Lua much more pleasant than Lisp. It is also performs significantly better. This could result in a very nice editor if enough people embrace it. Github page for the lazy: https://github.com/howl-editor/howl https://github.com/howl-editor/howl
- shalabhc 10y agoYes I find Howl so much better than the elisp and emacs archaic API.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]