4 ms·
I can see the conversation now. "If we build this as an open office, it's cheaper AND better? That's a slam dunk!" 6 years later ... "Turns out it's only che
by Clubber 10y ago
I can see the conversation now.
"If we build this as an open office, it's cheaper AND better? That's a slam dunk!"
6 years later ...
"Turns out it's only cheaper, not better. Hey, cheaper is better right?"
- pzh 10y agoPenny-wise and pound-foolish. If cheaper means throwing the time of your most expensive resource (engineers) down the drain to save some money on rent and Ikea furniture, then sure.
- Arizhel 10y agoHow is this foolish? This saves the company money, and helps executives get bigger bonuses. This might cause the company some problems in 5 years, but who cares? By then, the executives have already collected their bonuses and left.