3 ms·
Accept that terror attacks will get through sometimes. I don't disagree with you but this would be difficult for any one person to pass down from wherever it i
by castis 10y ago
Accept that terror attacks will get through sometimes.
I don't disagree with you but this would be difficult for any one person to pass down from wherever it is the person making these decisions sits. They'd have to accept that people are going to die and that by rolling back precautions, they take that on themselves.
The other 2 I wholly agree with.
- lb1lf 10y ago> They'd have to accept that people are going to die and that by rolling back precautions, they take that on themselves. -Oh, we already do in other aspects of life, so why not? An example: Driving a car has become ridiculously safe; as long as you don't head-on another car, chances are you'll survive. (As long as you don't do silly stuff like drive at 120mph, skip seatbelts and such). If we had separate lanes all over, there wouldn't be more head-on collisions. Lives saved. Only, we decided it wasn't worth the expense and inconvenience. We only have barriers between opposing lanes on the most accident-prone stretches of road. Personally, I'd be inclined to vote for just about anyone who had the balls to tell the public that bad things happen. Well, if they did it prior to something bad happening, at any rate.