> there shouldn't be politics in science Politics is unavoidable in science. There was never an era in which the two weren't combined from phrenology to modern

> there shouldn't be politics in science Politics is unavoidable in science. There was never an era in which the two weren't combined from phrenology to modern-day examples like global warming which you mentioned. To expect science to be free from outside influence is overly idealistic. Science needs funding. That fact alone makes it inseparable. > The ONLY merit Gall-Peters has is this supposed "social justice" bullshit. Now you're just being dishonest. Did you miss the whole "equal area" thing? > They just wanted attention and money. Yeah map projection creators are rolling in royalties... You tell me to find a better reason and you come up with bullshit like this, ha!