4 ms·
That's an article from May 01, 2000. That's 10 years ago. The situation of Lisp in that timeframe has improved by leaps and bounds. Much better documentation,
by Hexstream 16y ago
That's an article from May 01, 2000. That's 10 years ago.
The situation of Lisp in that timeframe has improved by leaps and bounds. Much better documentation, many more libraries, less community fragmentation (SBCL has become the clearly-best-supported implementation), better OS integration, new exciting stuff like Clojure, etc.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- shadowsun7 16y agoI wasn't arguing that he was wrong to drop Lisp. I'm merely pointing out that - contrary to OP's assertion, it's entirely possible to find reasons to not play with Lisp even if you're extremely familiar with the language.