I don't understand how rejecting that the state of the universe is fundamentally computable is the same as rejecting the Church-Turing Thesis. Rejecting the co

I don't understand how rejecting that the state of the universe is fundamentally computable is the same as rejecting the Church-Turing Thesis. Rejecting the computability of the universe's state is more fundamental: It rejects one of the assumptions of the Church-Turing Thesis, namely that there is a function to compute at all.