3 ms·

js; dr

• Shanea93 10y ago
  I copied the content here for anyone in a similar situation to the parent commenter: https://justpaste.it/14pz7 https://justpaste.it/14pz7 The HTML hidden in that mountain of div tags is remarkably well formed for the standard I see around on the "modern web".
  • mirimir 10y ago
    True. But it is ironic for a site named "hackerone.com" to serve nothing with Javascript blocked. Or maybe just a bad joke ;)
• dang 10y ago
  Please don't do this here.
  • snakeanus 10y ago
    Please don't do this here.
• BuuQu9hu 10y ago
  To expound on this: It's nearly unconscionable for a security-oriented site to mandate JS for basic functionality. There were no alternatives provided, the noscript blurb did not offer a list of domains which were serving the JS, there was no fallback rendering, and so we are forced to trust an unknown party to execute code in a leaky ambient jalopy of security failure. If we stop pointing this out, then we lose.