3 ms·
This could be really great for GCC if they pick the right subset. For instance, I could imagine that a GCC that takes advantage of namespaces, overloaded funct
by implicit 16y ago
This could be really great for GCC if they pick the right subset.
For instance, I could imagine that a GCC that takes advantage of namespaces, overloaded functions, and template functions (notably: not classes, exceptions, or implicit type coersion) to be quite a lot easier to understand than today's deeply preprocessor-dependent GCC.
It's easy to assume that C++ implies OO, but you really don't need to go that way, and you might not want to if you're starting with a project as old and hardened as GCC.
- danudey 16y agoI've heard anecdotal reports from a few developers that OS X's IOKit driver framework, and its limited subset of C++, works very well. It's very limited in terms of the language features available, and sounds like it strikes a good balance. Of course, this is all anecdotal. YMMV.