5 ms·
What's wrong with "we won't merge code we don't understand"? I think a lot of people should hold code to that standard. I think almost everyone does hold code t
by milesrout 10y ago
What's wrong with "we won't merge code we don't understand"? I think a lot of people should hold code to that standard. I think almost everyone does hold code to that standard.
- kzrdude 10y agoIt's a problem when leadership is not ~~merit~~ engagement based (BFDL) and when said leadership is lacking the vision and gut to push Python across new boundaries. I would like to see something more “aggressive” here.
- milesrout 10y agoThe leadership of Python, in the form of Guido, is certainly merit- and engagement-based. Nothing needs to be 'more aggressive' in Python development. It's perfectly fine for the standard, canonical version of Python to be the version that: * Is most up-to-date and has all the latest features * Everyone is most familiar with * Already is packaged in all operating systems * Is the most stable * Is compatible with all C extensions