It appears you misinterpreted the case. His partner's IP address was the one that was mistakenly entered into a system when a typo was introduced. She had nothi

It appears you misinterpreted the case. His partner's IP address was the one that was mistakenly entered into a system when a typo was introduced. She had nothing to do with it, nor did he. To be fair, the phrasing of the paragraph when this fact was introduced was hard to parse. > The IP address passed on corresponded to an internet account held by Nigel's partner. But it had been typed incorrectly, with an extra digit added by mistake. The typo resulted in a representation his partner's IP. i.e.: 1.1.1.2 //intended target 1.1.1.12 //the partner's