2 ms·
Since going to the pharmacy is a monthly deal and an expensive one, won't people be willing to settle on retail locations and density, to save significant amoun
by petra 10y ago
Since going to the pharmacy is a monthly deal and an expensive one, won't people be willing to settle on retail locations and density, to save significant amount of money(Maybe doing a family purchase) ? So that takes care of all the store fixed costs. And such a store would get an high density of customers, so it could always sell them something else.
And as for the cost of the pharmacists, in a well run pharmacy, with lower cost employees helping as much as they can, pharmacists can do their jobs very fast, a few short minutes per customer. And even if their salary salary is $1/min(six figures), that isn't much money.
EDIT: and btw, in Israel, with our national healthcare, pharmacies are pressed on margins by government/HMO's - and they lose money on drugs(or so the newspapers claim), but profit by selling other stuff(OTC/herbal/cosmetics/etc).
- Fomite 10y agoBetween actually doing their jobs, helping patients and arguing with drug companies and/or doctors, I'd be astonished if the average time/patient for a pharmacist was a few short minutes. My guess is that has a very long tailed distribution.