4 ms·
#2 imo. #3 is always at a perceptual disadvantage, because people are less willing to donate/spend on things they know have a high operating cost (in terms of s
by b34r 10y ago
#2 imo. #3 is always at a perceptual disadvantage, because people are less willing to donate/spend on things they know have a high operating cost (in terms of salary/bonuses) when it comes to nonprofits.
Many would say it doesn't matter if the end amount gets where it's supposed to, but humans don't like the concept of wasting their charity.
- franciscop 10y agoSorry it's intended to be a relationship and those were just a couple of examples. There are millions of values between #2 and #3, and some different relationship could be at play. What I mean is that for different people, wasting is a different value. Some people might be okay with a 40% overhead while other might not be okay with a 20% overhead.