5 ms·

> Employment is dead, contract is the way of the future. I am pretty happy with my employment. Paid vacation, paid sick days, reasonable hours and all that go

• lsaferite 10y ago
  Ok. Now imagine you are getting twice as much after taxes for the same work but without benefits. Would you still be as happy? Hell, even 50% more. And you are spreading the work across multiple clients so any one client 'firing' you is suddenly not a huge thing since your income is distributed across multiple clients. Sure, you don't get paid benefits, but you get higher income and the ability to work for multiple clients. Not every person can do that and even among those that can, not every one has the motivation to do it.
  • throwanem 10y ago
    > Now imagine you are getting twice as much after taxes for the same work That would have been wonderful!
  • Dayshine 10y ago
    >so any one client 'firing' you is suddenly not a huge thing With 3 months notice and strong union protection (public sector) it already isn't. I'd much rather work for a single excellent organisation where I know I'm doing good than many who can't hold on to good staff and need contractors.
    • lsaferite 10y ago
      I'd love those protections personally, but I have no such luck.
      • toomuchtodo 10y ago
        Always Be Interviewing.
      • nso 10y ago
        It's minimum requirement for a hire contract in Norway. 3 months mutual notification, and only in a few cases can you be fired on spot without compensation (theft and such). You can contractually increase the notification time from the baseline, but not decrease. Makes for happy and productive workers, and also benefits companies who don't have to worry about loosing their best worker without notice.
        • lsaferite 10y ago
          I think I read Norway just moved into #1 happiest country in the world...
        • tigershark 10y ago
          3 months notice period seems a very bad deal to me. If you want to change job you simply cannot because no one would wait for 3 months, unless you are at executive level.
          • dozzie 10y ago
            Yes, they would wait. Everybody else in the setting does. And then there probably is a way to shorten the notice period when both sides agree (I extrapolate to Norway how in my country it works).
            • CalRobert 10y ago
              I was shocked to see that a month of notice is common here (Ireland). It actually was an issue when I wanted to attend a conference for my new employer (gave notice around 11 PM exactly 30 days before I had to fly). I get that it's apparently an employee protection but it does seem kind of ludicrous. What happens if you rage quit? Win the lottery?
              • Dayshine 10y ago
                >What happens if you rage quit? Win the lottery? Well, I'm a professional, so I finish my job... I shouldn't be changing job more than once every 2 years, so 3 months is nothing. The notice period is often reduced for the first 6 months, or you can ask for that before signing your contract. In reality a company has no real desire to keep a disgruntled employee longer than they have to, so you can burn bridges and leave earlier if force the issue. It's a pretty unprofessional thing to do though.
  • fs111 10y ago
    Well that all sounds nice and dandy, but imagine you don't find new clients or they don't pay your invoices or you get seriously sick or something in your private life needs all your attention. Employment isn't so bad in those cases.
    • SketchySeaBeast 10y ago
      That's my struggle with this - it feels like living in constant fear of something going awry and a bout of extreme anxiety every 6-12 months. I'll take my impostor syndrome and constant medium-high anxiety thank you very much.
    • lsaferite 10y ago
      Yes, you have to get new clients, that is always a risk. Proper structuring of payment schedules and IP transfer helps with invoice payment. Also, having long-term relationships with clients also helps there. I would hope you carry some sort of insurance in the case of life taking a sudden left-turn, but perhaps you don't. Ideally you financially plan enough to cover something like that. I've been a contractor as several points in my life and loved it mostly. It is sometimes stressful making sure everything is on track, but the freedom of not depending on any one client and the difference in income that allowed me to work less If I wanted was great. I currently work as an employee and also like the benefits it provides and the people I work with. But, I also know that ultimately companies now days have very little loyalty so my mind never lets me think of being an employee as some absolute guarantee of stability.
      • fs111 10y ago
        > I currently work as an employee and also like the benefits it provides and the people I work with. So you broadly claim that "employment is dead" using big words like "feudal system" and how you can make so much more money contracting etc. etc. and then it turns out you are an employee after all? Seriously?
        • usefulcat 10y ago
          Check the usernames; unless Isaferite is the same person as VLM, Isaferite didn't make the comments you're quoting.
  • AstralStorm 10y ago
    This never happens, as there is a minimum time to create a "minimum viable work unit" and often you're paid to deliver as soon as possible, not a year later. I've never seen a contract with enough slack to make overlapping work reasonable. It is not physically possible. Might only work if you're selling templates or are a Mechanical Turk. Generally higher income is not much higher either way, at least around here. Nobody wants to hire contractors for more than they have to pay full time employees. You still get to pay your health insurance (typically covered by employer automatically here) and taxes.
    • lsaferite 10y ago
      Well, from personal, non-template, work I can say that I was frequently running work from 2-4 clients easily enough. If a client was more demanding of time then I was more demanding on cost. If contract work is getting paid the same as FTE, then something is messed up. I literally charged double what I make right now as an FTE. And yeah, I even called out the missing benefits, but that's something you pay for out of the income differential. I've been a contract worker several times in my life. I'm currently a FTE and like the people I work for. Going contract is certainly not for everyone and is perhaps a panic inducing decision depending on your current situation.
  • amyjess 10y ago
    > Now imagine you are getting twice as much after taxes for the same work but without benefits. No, I wouldn't. I value stability and simplicity in my life, and I will gladly eschew higher pay for a more traditional lifestyle. I'm a conservative suburbanite with no ambition, and I'm proud of it. On top of that, non-employer insurance is terrible. In some states, you actually cannot get a PPO unless you're on an employer's policy (I refuse to get an HMO for moral reasons), and large megacorps (we're talking Disney-sized corporations here) will package their own insurance and offer benefits that go above and beyond what you can get anywhere else. > and the ability to work for multiple clients That's a negative for me. I'm a strict 9-5er. I just want to show up at the office every weekday, put in my eight hours, then go home and relax. I actively do not want to run my own business or do anything that resembles negotiating with anyone. I'm not an entrepreneur or a risk-taker of any kind.
    • abraham_s 10y ago
      "(I refuse to get an HMO for moral reasons)" Can you elaborate on this?
      • amyjess 10y ago
        HMOs mandate that Primary Care Physicians act as gatekeepers, and their job is to control how and when you seek the services of other doctors. Medical gatekeeping is a violation of the fundamental human right to body autonomy.
        • nwordsam3 10y ago
          This is false. It's insurance, they don't prevent you from seeing any provider you want, they just have set out certain limitations on what they will cover. All insurance has limitations, an HMO is just on a spectrum of coverage. A PPO plan won't cover every provider either.
    • lsaferite 10y ago
      I'd argue that being an employee is less stable than you think it is in general, at least in the tech sector. I had my own private PPO for a decade (geez!) at least, and the policy provisions were better than most employer policies I saw offered to me. Well, at least until the ACA came around and shook everything up a little. I'm happy you're a happy 9-5er with zero business desire and that you are 100% risk averse. You are not the target of my comment.
  • AIMunchkin 10y ago
    "so any one client 'firing' you is suddenly not a huge thing since your income is distributed across multiple clients" For whom you have to spend roughly 1/3 of your time on collection because companies don't get rich writing a lot of checks. If it fits your psyche, great. Not everyone is like you.
    • lsaferite 10y ago
      As I said in another comment, part of that is covered by proper payment structuring and IP transfer provisions while the rest is covered by having long-term clients that you have a good relationship with.
• zeveb 10y ago
  Honestly, I like unlimited unpaid days off: they give me the freedom to choose when to work, and when not to, with no hard feelings.
  • CalRobert 10y ago
    It's surprising how few companies will bend on this. In my experience it seemed like they were more concerned about the possibility of other employees getting notions. It's a big reason to move somewhere that mandates vacation time (though again, I'd rather just take as much time as I want unpaid).