4 ms·
if it may benefit anyone, i used this simple batch file to test out the lower bound -quality 84 with drag and drop of one/multiple images on win 86-64: echo
by underlines 10y ago
if it may benefit anyone, i used this simple batch file to test out the lower bound -quality 84 with drag and drop of one/multiple images on win 86-64:
echo Drag and drop one or multiple jpg or png files onto this batch file, to compress with google guetzli using a psychovisual model
if [%1]==[] goto :eof
:loop
echo compressing...
guetzli_windows_x86-64.exe -quality 84 %1 "%~dpn1_guetzlicompressed%~x1"
shift
if not [%1]==[] goto loop
echo DONE
i'm concerned about the color changes that are clearly visible throughout the whole image.
- JyrkiAlakuijala 10y agoGuetzli runs the whole image to the same specified quality -- when artefacts start to emerge, they are everywhere, not just in one sensitive area. Guetzli can be more likely worth its cpu cost at a higher quality, around 92-96.