2 ms·
But harm reduction and improving data for other cases is not the intended use of warrants and contempt of court, or is it?
by mickronome 10y ago
But harm reduction and improving data for other cases is not the intended use of warrants and contempt of court, or is it?
- mjolk 10y agoNo, and thanks for catching that. My understanding is that the prosecution doesn't need the decrypted data to secure a guilty verdict, but as they're entitled to it, they likely want it for secondary benefit.