Unfortunately the opinion seems to show serious forgetfulness on their own part. On page 7, "Doe, however, stated that he could not remember the passwords nece

Unfortunately the opinion seems to show serious forgetfulness on their own part. On page 7, "Doe, however, stated that he could not remember the passwords necessary to decrypt the hard drives and entered several incorrect passwords during the forensic examination." These events took place after the original search warrant but before the finding of contempt. It's curious that these facts are included in the background section but not the legal analysis.