3 ms·
Here's mine: destruction of evidence is a crime. Probably not the best idea. Hiding the partition or otherwise making the encrypted data hidden is probably yo
by striking 10y ago
Here's mine: destruction of evidence is a crime.
Probably not the best idea.
Hiding the partition or otherwise making the encrypted data hidden is probably your only bet.
- Overtonwindow 10y agoWhich would you rather go down for: destruction of evidence, or what's in your hard drive? I'm asking a technical question, not a legal one. There are many instances where this would be preferable than giving up the data.
- striking 10y agoIf someone released such a tool, the feds would make sure to clone your hard drive before supplying the password to it, or write a patched version of the tool that reads it to remove the disk wiping call. And then you'd be in really hot water.
- MaulingMonkey 10y agoAn interesting talk on disk antiforensics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZtkANvDxZA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZtkANvDxZA Of course, having watched this, the feds might look for such tricks...
- naasking 10y agoI expect cloning to already be standard forensic procedure, but perhaps I'm wrong. If not, it should be.
- Kostchei 10y agoyep. Work on the copy, or the copy of the copy in my case. It's digital with a hash, not a vhs tape
- Overtonwindow 10y agoAh cloning, very good point. So that raises a new question: Is there any way to prevent decryption of a drive, when the password is forcibly obtained?
- fatal510 10y agoThat's why you say "There is nothing on that drive! Here you can have the password."
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]