To be fair, I'm not arguing that mathematics is art. I'm arguing that this article is a meaningless pile of shit, even though I find the question of whether thi

To be fair, I'm not arguing that mathematics is art. I'm arguing that this article is a meaningless pile of shit, even though I find the question of whether things are art or not to be generally meaningful. The author has succumbed to the scotsman fallacy. The criteria by which he judges whether or not a thing is art is kept hidden, and there is no way for the reader to verify that they even exist.