I actually agree with your original argument, and disagree with sdf's as you interpreted it. I just interpreted sdf's argument differently. I described how I ca

I actually agree with your original argument, and disagree with sdf's as you interpreted it. I just interpreted sdf's argument differently. I described how I came to that conclusion in response to the comment you mentioned. I think basically I assumed grammatical/syntactical correctness and a weird argument, and you and others assumed the reverse. I hope sdf clarifies because I'd actually guess I'm prone to making this kind of communication error (if I'm in error, of course).