3 ms·
Well, yes and no. Yes, to a certain extent papers don't have enough details for replication, but this is mainly because you just can't fit enough details into t
by semi-extrinsic 10y ago
Well, yes and no. Yes, to a certain extent papers don't have enough details for replication, but this is mainly because you just can't fit enough details into the scope of a journal paper. In a PhD thesis, you should be able to.
And no, it's not that replication becomes a guessing exercise, but it's the fact that the time spent setting up, debugging and then running a replication of even a perfectly described benchtop-style experiment costs much much more than the actual equipment involved. And the ROI is poor, since replication studies are hard to publish.
- btilly 10y agoShould, sure. But there can be critical details needed to replicate which the experimenter didn't realize were important and didn't think to record. And possibly didn't notice. One of the reasons why replication matters is that it is a way of discovering these factors which matter but weren't obvious.