5 ms·
It looks like it had 0 success, maybe even less than 4 years work's worth of revenue (I couldn't find any data on it), so the conclusion should be the opposite:
by xiphias 10y ago
It looks like it had 0 success, maybe even less than 4 years work's worth of revenue (I couldn't find any data on it), so the conclusion should be the opposite: even if people slow other people down by getting on agreement, the final quality is usually better.
- sosuke 10y agoIt isn't even available for sale yet is it? I didn't get any impression about 0 success. Amazon is saying 2017 (unavailable)
- xiphias 10y agoActually you're right. Still, I don't see any data proving the headline in the title by any metric. The whole article is just an advertisement.
- zck 10y agoI wouldn't be surprised if anyone who takes four years to animate a film alone doesn't measure success solely in financial terms.
- xiphias 10y agoProbably not, it was just my expectation to see some beautiful animation that a team wouldn't be able to do after the headline. I still remember when I watched Lion King in the theatre when I was about 10 years old, and I was very sad when Disney shut down the hand-made animation studio. I would love to see something similar, but in my eyes this comes nothing close to those movies.
- ant6n 10y agoIt's going to come out on March 28 for viewing online, right now on preorder: http://novaseedmovie.com/watch-nova-seed/ http://novaseedmovie.com/watch-nova-seed/
- rhizome 10y agoJust to be clear, are you specifically equating quality with revenue?
- jessaustin 10y agoTFA says the movie is playing festivals in order to land a distributor. Why would we expect to find "revenue data"?
- egypturnash 10y agoHe's basically just finished it. And is doing pretty good in generating buzz IMHO - I spent the last four and a half years drawing a solo graphic novel, and I sure don't have an article in Forbes about it,