4 ms·
>The Bilderberg Group does exist, has economically powerful members and acts in private. A bunch of wealthy and influential people assemble to discuss policy a
by prolly_a_moron 10y ago
>The Bilderberg Group does exist, has economically powerful members and acts in private.
A bunch of wealthy and influential people assemble to discuss policy and other strategy. I'm not sure why this is unexpected, bad, or why it should be frowned upon or disallowed.
- oh_sigh 10y agoWell, considering the wealth and power concentrated in those rooms during the meeting, these people would have a good shot at foisting whatever system they want over the world. I'm not arguing it should be disallowed, but it is disconcerting when every billionaire in the world might agree on the same set of policies.
- thr0waway1239 10y agoNot endorsing the guy in this video and don't know much about him personally. With that disclaimer, if you watch this video his lampooning of these meetings as an insider is quite hilarious. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbfBi-O8ijg#t=11m45s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbfBi-O8ijg#t=11m45s
- DarkKomunalec 10y agoBecause when the super-wealthy collaborate, it's usually on stuff that benefits them, to the expense of everyone else, e.g. software patents, copyright extensions, and trade agreements with all sorts of fun stuff hidden inside: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Partnership_intellectual_property_provisions#Parallel_imports https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Partnership_inte...
- rfrank 10y agoWhen money is equivalent to speech, it's very easy to shout people down.
- ryandrake 10y ago"People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices." -Adam Smith