That is all well and good, but if a review write things like this For example, the similarly priced Electrolux EFLS617SIW removed 27 percent more stains tha

That is all well and good, but if a review write things like this For example, the similarly priced Electrolux EFLS617SIW removed 27 percent more stains than this Speed Queen on its Heavy Duty cycle and 13 percent more stains on its Whites cycle. We got similar results from Kenmore, LG, Maytag, and Whirlpool front-loaders Those stains remain in spite of the fact that this Speed Queen uses over 40 gallons of water for the Whites cycle and over 24 gallons for the Normal Eco. We estimate that this washer will cost around $85 a year to run. That's average for a top-load machine, but almost triple what a more-efficient front loader costs. A lot of our readers tell us they don't care about the environmental impact of their appliances. But, maybe they'll care about the extra $275 on their water bills over five years of ownership. I'm skipping it sadly (unless their front loaders are any better.)