7 ms·
The point of the article is to point out that the incidences of suicide in the military isn't disproportionate to civilians. This is something that's being blow
by whb07 10y ago
The point of the article is to point out that the incidences of suicide in the military isn't disproportionate to civilians. This is something that's being blown out of proportion by the media and in return Congress pushes down DoD to make this a bigger issue than what it really is.
Furthermore, your relative is a grown adult who decided that he should stay the course and not see a therapist for his condition based on possible consequences on his career. Clearly this happens in every career where there are high rewards, in this case a life time pension(valued over $1mm). Well, shit guess what, he made to him what seems like the best choice.
For reference, look at a surgeon who is getting the shakes on his right hand or the NFL player hiding his broken collarbone injury during his free agent try outs. Or for a more military reference: the young guy hiding his fracture on X bone during selection phase for Y job. (doctor's typical question: "why didnt you come to us sooner when you knew something was wrong", clearly has no idea the drive and motivation behind the young man)
- nananonymous 10y agoI think the comments above are pointing out what appear to be perverse incentives surrounding seeking mental health resources. It raises the question of whether those incentives could be changed in a way that all parties would benefit.
- coldtea 10y ago>The point of the article is to point out that the incidences of suicide in the military isn't disproportionate to civilians. Note that for this to be OK, we should expect to see the same number of incidences in the military as one expects to see in civilians. If we have a reason to expect lower suicide rates from military personnel (e.g. better health, less incidents of alcoholism/substance abuse, no joblessness, regular psychiatric evaluations, etc compared to the general population), then it's not OK.
- gech 10y agoSo dismissive and ignorant of systemic causes, reduces problems to an individual's "choices". Diagnosis: conservatism.