3 ms·
Not necessarily. It broke within six months. It's believable that he didn't know anything about the parentage of Otto, and when the lawsuit hit, he realized jus
by jonathankoren 10y ago
Not necessarily. It broke within six months. It's believable that he didn't know anything about the parentage of Otto, and when the lawsuit hit, he realized just how screwed up of a situation he found himself in and bailed.
We can't say it is related, but we can't say it's not related either.
- phailhaus 10y ago> We can't say it is related, but we can't say it's not related either. ...and that's why you should leave it out of the headline.
- daenney 10y agoThat's a fair point, I hadn't considered that. I still think leaving it out of the article is fair though. Since we don't know one way or another and there isn't anything pointing in that direction just yet.