>but he has said repeatedly that git's hash is primarily for indexing and error correction, and not primarily for security And he was wrong as openpgp signatur

>but he has said repeatedly that git's hash is primarily for indexing and error correction, and not primarily for security And he was wrong as openpgp signatures on commits and tags are a thing. Not sure when that feature was introduced however, I doubt that it existed in the first version of git. That being said he should have changed the hash function the moment that feature was introduced.