> Apple don't make the LG Ultrafine Display. But they did make monitors. And Routers. And other things that people bought into. Because Apple "just works."

> Apple don't make the LG Ultrafine Display. But they did make monitors. And Routers. And other things that people bought into. Because Apple "just works." But now it doesn't. > Apple still make amazing 5120×2880, 10-bits-per-channel screens: The Retina iMacs. If your business depends on such screens, you'd get the iMacs iMacs are not replacements for MBP + Apple's monitors. > Why? Because the previous models have features and capabilities that the new ones do not that they prefer. > Like? What complaints specifically? For example, the touch bar button activating not when someone wants the touch buttons to activate. Specifically the latest case, I had a friend joke about how he's changed the background color of his terminal so many time since moving to the latest MBP. That's just one example. > They have some of the... shrug I know what I see. Sorry, but running scripts side by side with an older MBP compared to the latest MBP, the older one won hands down. > I use it daily And you weren't clued into the GPs remark about the touch screen? You honestly couldn't figure it out? > They've also outsold all other competitors in just a single month. And just because others like something, that means it's good for me?