145 ms·
He can't understand Haskell, it's just more aesthetically pleasing upfront, so I'd hazard a guess that the analysis is shallow.
by alnayyir 16y ago
He can't understand Haskell, it's just more aesthetically pleasing upfront, so I'd hazard a guess that the analysis is shallow.
- KirinDave 16y agoI was gonna say. Haskell can be an incredibly dense language with a lot of patterns you have to know to effectively read it. Lisp should be much less dense by comparison.