4 ms·
Reading even one changed line tells us that they replaced hardcoded char arrays for SHA1 with a generic struct that could be used as a container for any hash.
by chmod775 10y ago
Reading even one changed line tells us that they replaced hardcoded char arrays for SHA1 with a generic struct that could be used as a container for any hash.
Some functions that previously operated on those char arrays have been changed to deal with the more generic struct instead.
- angry_octet 10y agoI consider it unlikely that it will change again, but somehow it is unsatisfying that it doesn't have a hash version, e.g. in the first nibble of the hash. If they had done that we could have avoided the unpleasantness long ago.