> need not be in scope of intuition. > Imagine Imagination is in principle intuitive. > it recognises no individual things, not even itself, self-awareness

> need not be in scope of intuition. > Imagine Imagination is in principle intuitive. > it recognises no individual things, not even itself, self-awareness is part of the common definition of intelligence. > Imagine [something that is patently made up] > Yet it is true utter nonsense > it has no intuition of the natural numbers. If this being makes statement on arithmetic, like 1+1=2, ... How? You can't just say > imagine Natural numbers need not be in scope of intuition > then Natural numbers need not be in scope of intuition I mean, sure you can, but that is circular reasoning and not at all convincing.