3 ms·

I listened to the debates many times. Trump brought up jobs for rural America over and over because he knew how badly it effected many Americans. Hillary brough

by jbhatab 10y ago

I listened to the debates many times. Trump brought up jobs for rural America over and over because he knew how badly it effected many Americans. Hillary brought up jobs much less. I should just do a tally on how many times Trump mentioned jobs vs Hilary in the election race. I'm confident it would lean towards Trump. PS. I am 100% not a Trump supporter. See how this devolves into assuming I'm a Trump supporter? I'm just stating things based on what they said. I never even attacked Hilary and her claims.

swang 10y ago
i'm guessing you mean hillary didn't bring up jobs in rural america vs jobs in general? because hillary literally had outlined how we as a country would move ahead and sustain our jobs/economy (basically: more education, investment in technology, encouraging startups). all trump has talked about is how jobs are fleeing america. he even criticized ford for moving jobs from michigan when in fact they weren't. so please, if you're going to say trump brought up jobs, at least address the fact that he didn't offer any solutions then, nor has he offered any now. that Carrier "job save" of 1000 was due to the state of indiana offering them incentives to keep the jobs here. that's not a very sustainable idea (also, although i'm not necessarily opposed to states giving companies incentives like this at tax-payer expense, that move seems very anti-free market all things considered).
- icelancer 10y ago
  >more education, investment in technology, encouraging startups This is very, very obviously not what rural Americans want to hear.
intended 10y ago
But all politicians promise jobs - this is nothing new. Even Hillary promised jobs, she even had plans for it. Promising jobs is not new.
- pmorici 10y ago
  She supported TPP which people viewed as anti job. Trump was strongly against TPP. Stuff like that speaks louder than simple I'm gonna create jobs promises which as you say all politicians say. edit: correct acronym.
  - Brakenshire 10y ago
    You've got your acronym wrong, it's TPP not TTP.
  - intended 10y ago
    Actually, she had a plan, and had the technical/ bureaucratic/ legal backing to make It. Trump, had and has not come up with a concrete plan as I recall. His current plan seems to be to... I don't know actually. Just opposing the TPP doesn't make a case for trump winning votes and the presidency. Trump had other actual statements, like "i will not let ford shut this plant down, and send jobs to Mexico!" Let's not forget: "we'll start hitting those people where it hurts the most!" Those people being immigrants and China, who were "taking all the jobs." hillary believed that most people would be rational and not vote for someone that obviously against what America stood for. He has had more scandal in his run for office than I've seen in many imaginative tv shows. It seems, when it came down to it, people chose to vote for their party. Even if whatever trump said or did, was against what they held as the standard for a president.

by jbhatab 10y ago

swang 10y ago

i'm guessing you mean hillary didn't bring up jobs in rural america vs jobs in general? because hillary literally had outlined how we as a country would move ahead and sustain our jobs/economy (basically: more education, investment in technology, encouraging startups). all trump has talked about is how jobs are fleeing america. he even criticized ford for moving jobs from michigan when in fact they weren't. so please, if you're going to say trump brought up jobs, at least address the fact that he didn't offer any solutions then, nor has he offered any now. that Carrier "job save" of 1000 was due to the state of indiana offering them incentives to keep the jobs here. that's not a very sustainable idea (also, although i'm not necessarily opposed to states giving companies incentives like this at tax-payer expense, that move seems very anti-free market all things considered).

icelancer 10y ago
>more education, investment in technology, encouraging startups This is very, very obviously not what rural Americans want to hear.

intended 10y ago

But all politicians promise jobs - this is nothing new. Even Hillary promised jobs, she even had plans for it. Promising jobs is not new.

pmorici 10y ago
She supported TPP which people viewed as anti job. Trump was strongly against TPP. Stuff like that speaks louder than simple I'm gonna create jobs promises which as you say all politicians say. edit: correct acronym.
- Brakenshire 10y ago
  You've got your acronym wrong, it's TPP not TTP.
- intended 10y ago
  Actually, she had a plan, and had the technical/ bureaucratic/ legal backing to make It. Trump, had and has not come up with a concrete plan as I recall. His current plan seems to be to... I don't know actually. Just opposing the TPP doesn't make a case for trump winning votes and the presidency. Trump had other actual statements, like "i will not let ford shut this plant down, and send jobs to Mexico!" Let's not forget: "we'll start hitting those people where it hurts the most!" Those people being immigrants and China, who were "taking all the jobs." hillary believed that most people would be rational and not vote for someone that obviously against what America stood for. He has had more scandal in his run for office than I've seen in many imaginative tv shows. It seems, when it came down to it, people chose to vote for their party. Even if whatever trump said or did, was against what they held as the standard for a president.