3 ms·
I don't have a problem with someone tinkering with coffee cup designs if it gives them enjoyment. I just find the pretense that it's going to make a non-neglig
by philk 16y ago
I don't have a problem with someone tinkering with coffee cup designs if it gives them enjoyment. I just find the pretense that it's going to make a non-negligible difference to the environment puzzling and intellectually dishonest.
What's wrong with a feel-good distraction? Instead of implementing "Hello World" in 120 languages, why not tinker with papercup designs?
Why not do something actually meaningful?
There's an awesome talk by Richard Hamming on pg's website
(http://www.paulgraham.com/hamming.html http://www.paulgraham.com/hamming.html), where he recounts:
And I started asking, ``What are the important problems of your field?'' And after a week or so, ``What important problems are you working on?'' And after some more time I came in one day and said, ``If what you are doing is not important, and if you don't think it is going to lead to something important, why are you at Bell Labs working on it?'' I wasn't welcomed after that; I had to find somebody else to eat with!
- Tichy 16y ago"58 billion paper coffee cups" doesn't sound so negligible to me? Sure, it is might not be as paramount as plugging the oil spill to me, but perhaps making a small impact is better than no impact. I just mentioned the 120 programming languages because I am sure that post would make it on HN, too. Are you working on superimportant stuff all the time? Also read Richard Feynman's books - he claims when he was stuck for a while, he only managed to make progress again when he started to do calculations on the rotation of thrown paper cups just for fun for a while. He later derived some quantum mechanics stuff from those paper cup equations.