3 ms·

I agree with your criticism of the article. I thought you might find PNaCl interesting, though: replace x86 with llvmbc: http://www.google.com/m/url?cd=3&clie

by pohl 16y ago

I agree with your criticism of the article. I thought you might find PNaCl interesting, though: replace x86 with llvmbc: http://www.google.com/m/url?cd=3&client=safari&ct=res&ei=0mcCTNDhOI2dlge5nNV0&hl=en&oe=UTF-8&oi=blended&q=http%3A%2F%2Fnativeclient.googlecode.com%2Fsvn%2Fdata%2Fsite%2Fpnacl.pdf&resnum=3&sa=X&ved=0CBMQFjAC&usg=AFQjCNFN2V6Hm7-pr15gPmqc1YnSkgJRjQ http://www.google.com/m/url?cd=3&client=safari&ct=re... edit: sorry I couldn't canonicalize that URL from my phone

ynniv 16y ago
How often do you get to suggest how something should be done only to find out it's already in progress? :-) I think that LLVM might become the universal web bytecode that Java was supposed to be. There is still the issue of a standard library and browser interop that could allow something else to win in the long term, but this is a huge step in the right direction. [the canonical url for your link: http://nativeclient.googlecode.com/svn/data/site/pnacl.pdf http://nativeclient.googlecode.com/svn/data/site/pnacl.pdf]