> The answer would be rigor. Nonsense. Back to the original question, the reason why economics has influence is because it involves money. The people who hold

> The answer would be rigor. Nonsense. Back to the original question, the reason why economics has influence is because it involves money. The people who hold the purse strings talk in that language, and those people always pay themselves first. Sociology could have perfect rigor, beyond that of any other disciple, but it would never have the influence of economics.