I will second the Plutopia recommendation, with a caution. The author tries too hard (IMO) sometimes to narratively equate Richland and Ozyorsk in terms of cont

I will second the Plutopia recommendation, with a caution. The author tries too hard (IMO) sometimes to narratively equate Richland and Ozyorsk in terms of contamination. By the numbers -- and there are numbers in the book -- Ozyorsk suffered far worse contamination. At the Ozyorsk site the ambient environment suffered far worse exposure, plutonium workers suffered far worse exposure, and nearby populations suffered far worse exposure. But that's not to give the Hanford site a free pass. It is creepy and infuriating how the operators undertook casual large scale experiments and covered up accidents. It's doubly infuriating how locals with good plutonium jobs would turn a blind eye to, or turn against, people who were harmed on the job and whose medical/safety complaints threatened the illusion that everything was great.