4 ms·
That's my go-to reference when looking for new routes. We can really think of its reliability as a signal-to-noise ratio: inexperienced road cyclists might caus
by phumbe 10y ago
That's my go-to reference when looking for new routes. We can really think of its reliability as a signal-to-noise ratio: inexperienced road cyclists might cause the map to show significant traffic on bad roads while experienced cyclists choose good roads. There are presumably fewer cyclists entering the realm of road cycling than there are experienced road cyclists. The new road cyclists are likely aware of the dangers of the sport, so in most cases, they probably seek resources for planning rides (e.g., cycling groups).
That brings up another point: Group rides will generally use good roads, and there will be multiple cyclists simultaneously contributing to the same route on the heat map. The boldest paths on the heat map may then very possibly be routes ridden by group rides, suggesting they're very safe.
- loeg 10y agoMore experienced cyclists might be more likely to own and use GPS units as well. Strava's heatmap only has data from users that self-report GPS traces.
- jalessio 10y agoStrava has apps for iPhone and Android so the barrier of entry is lower than owning a dedicated GPS unit: https://support.strava.com/hc/en-us/articles/223297187-How-to-get-your-Activities-to-Strava#app https://support.strava.com/hc/en-us/articles/223297187-How-t...
- loeg 10y agoOh, you're right. I totally forgot about that.