So I looked at this link (via the above) from the WSJ: http://bit.ly/cqsUZV http://bit.ly/cqsUZV Anybody know why digging a hole say 500 feet deep, 50 feet si

So I looked at this link (via the above) from the WSJ: http://bit.ly/cqsUZV http://bit.ly/cqsUZV Anybody know why digging a hole say 500 feet deep, 50 feet side by side with the gushing well and putting some c4 in there wouldn't work? At any rate, I read this: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=158297 http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=158297 Particularly, the non-nuclear option. I think they should run models and truly consider it. Perhaps they need to run models and then f-ing blow that up (if the models say that the resulting rubble will sufficiently re-cover the well). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KkhbbX4AcU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KkhbbX4AcU They could assemble a massive amount of dirt around the well. Create a large circular mound, and then just collapse it from underneath. That's what I would do. And I didn't even stay a Holiday Inn last night. Jk. I'm sure everyone has an opinion. I couldn't find a place to really say anything here: http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/doc/2931/546759/ http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/doc/2931/546759/ So I posted this. Anyway...